Legal Opinion

Scherr v. Taylor International Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, claiming to be a holder in due course, seeks recovery on a promissory note made by defendant to the Atlantic Funding Corp., as payee thereof. Prior to maturity Atlantic indorsed and delivered the note to plaintiff as payment on account of an indebtedness owed to it by the former. Defendant acknowledges the execution of the note and concedes its liability for the amount thereof. By way of defense and counterclaim defendant alleges that it is prohibited from paying the note by virtue of a writ of garnishment (attachment) obtained by one A. Herbert Mathes,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. Bank of BlasdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  3. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Bartels v. Rubel Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Segal v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RogersNassau County District Court · 1964
  2. City of New York v. Nic Homes, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API