Cadle Co. v. Lobingier

OPINION ON REHEARING

SAM J. DAY, Justice.

I. Introduction

We withdraw our opinion and judgment of June 22, 2000 and substitute this opinion and judgment in their place. We deny David B. Lobingier’s motion for rehearing.

In this appeal, The Cadle Company (Ca-dle), Daniel C. Cadle a/k/a Dan Cadle (Daniel), and Citizens Against Corrupt Attorneys (CACA) attack three separate *601judgments: this court’s 1996 contempt judgment, the trial court’s arrearage judgment, and the trial court’s 1998 contempt judgment. We dismiss in part, reform in part, affirm in part, and reverse and render in part.

II. 1996…