Hyatt v. Murray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Pine county to recover $5,860 for personal injuries. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Crosby, J., who, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the action. From an order denying a. new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to recover for personal injuries, which was dismissed on the trial below when plaintiff rested, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The evidence tends to show the following facts: The defendants were engaged in the logging business at Arlburg; this state, and on the day of the accident complained of, with their servants, were loading a quantity of logs upon cars for shipment out of the woods. Plaintiff was in the employ of the surveyor general of logs and lumber of ■the Fifth district, and was sent to Arlburg at the request of defendants to scale the logs so being…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Wallin v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Emery v. Minneapolis Industrial ExpositionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Lauritsen v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henry W. Cross Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Kohler v. W. J. Jennison Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Conway v. Charles H. Wood & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Folsom v. HojnySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Resnikoff v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.