Legal Opinion
Exum v. Ferguson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1981No. 13315PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
In 1974, plaintiff Roy Exum d/b/a Roy Exum Trucking (Exum) obtained commercial truck insurance through the defendant Ferguson Insurance Agency (Ferguson). Ferguson obtained a policy for Exum with the Occidental Fire and Casualty Company (Occidental) through their general agent Richter-Robb and Company (Richter-Robb). Occidental, in August of 1976, notified Richter-Robb that Exum’s coverage was going to be cancelled. Richter-Robb then notified Ferguson by phone and memo that the policy was going to be cancelled, but no specific cancellation date was given and neither…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Doreen C. Mann v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Mitchell v. Intermountain Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Consol. Vista Hills LitigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- McConal Aviation, Inc. v. Commercial Aviation InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Amrep Southwest, Inc. v. Shollenbarger Wood Treating, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Houck v. Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.