Legal Opinion
Houck v. Farmers Insurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 20, 2009No. 105,295PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
T1 Defendants, Farmers Insurance Company and related entities (collectively, Farmers), appeal the trial court's certification of this case as a class action. We affirm.
FACTS
1 2 Plaintiffs, Ladonna Houck, Roberta Oliver, and Tasha Sherman-Harris, are insurance policyholders of Farmers. Their poli-cles all contain identical clauses providing what is known as no-fault "med-pay" coverage. These clauses provide that where an insured suffers bodily injury in an accident, Farmers will pay reasonable expenses for necessary medical services furnished within two years…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re Farmers Med-Pay LitigationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- RIPP v. OKLAHOMA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022