Legal Opinion

Pitchford v. Stoddard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1926No. 16745PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The declaration in this case does not show a trespass upon the plaintiff’s property. Construing the allegations most strongly against her, as must be done on demurrer, it does not appear that the defendants were in the plaintiff’s building without her consent. The petition alleges that two of them had occupied unit No. 7 for some time immediately preceding their arrest, and that the plaintiff did not know that they were in the building with a bottle of liquor. It goes no further than to aver that the liquor was there without her knowledge or consent. But…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Macon v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Hines v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  3. Adamson v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Clark v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Standard Oil Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API