Adamson v. McEwen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. December 13, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
This was a suit against four persons to recover the value of a mule alleged to have been killed by their negligent conduct in the running and operation of an automobile. A verdict was returned against three of the defendants,—Shirley Boykin, Bussell Smith and Charles Adamson,—and in favor of the other defendant—Dave Horton. Boykin, Smith, and Adamson filed a joint motion’for new trial, which was overruled; and the judgment overruling the motion is assigned as error. Boykin insists that the verdict against him was without any evidence to support it, in that he had no interest whatever in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Clarke v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Dale v. Denver City Tramway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Neff & Co. v. BroomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hightower v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Sarman v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Smith v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Mayor of Savannah v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Neve v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.