George Rose Sodding & Grading Co. v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.
By request for admissions, the defendant City of Omaha admitted pumping raw sewage onto plaintiff’s property at least 6 times in the years 1968 and 1969. In this trespass suit, plaintiff alleged damages to trees, and that plaintiff was put to the expense of using road grading equipment to remove the raw sewage that blocked the driveway.
The district court directed a verdict for the city because of failure of proof that any tree damage was proximately caused by the flow of the sewage. It refused to hear testimony on the issue of the reasonable cost and expense of the removal of the sewage from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paup v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Williams v. FullerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Spillman v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
- Kochenthal v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Hutmacher v. City of MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Spilinek v. SpilinekNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- George Rose Sodding & Grading Comany, Inc. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Allan v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.