Hubbard v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDickson, Justice
The defendant-appellant, William L. Hubbard, Jr., was convicted of murder, 1 felony murder, 2 attempted murder, 3 rob bery, 4 and confinement. 5 His appeal 6 presents a single issue: insufficient evidence. The defendant contends that his convictions rest almost entirely upon the testimony of the victim, Kimie Stewart, whom he contends is an “inherently incredible witness.” Brief of Defendant-Appellant at 8. He argues that the failure of any other witness to corroborate Stewart’s testimony and inconsistencies between it and the physical evidence demonstrate that it was inherently incredible.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Tillman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Webster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by9 opinions
- King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Genario Garcia v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- James Hendricks v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.