Legal Opinion

Neddermeyer v. Town of Ontario Planning Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with Supreme Court that the determination of the Town of Ontario Planning Board, in denying petitioners’ application *909for a special permit to use their residence as a church, was arbitrary and capricious. The inclusion of churches among uses permitted in the zoning district is tantamount to a legislative determination that the use is in harmony with the general zoning plan and will not be detrimental…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of ThomastonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Cornell University v. BagnardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Viscio v. Town of Guilderland Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Pilato v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Taylor v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison Orthodox Minyan, Inc. v. Town Board of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Pilato v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Nisco v. Town of Perinton Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API