Legal Opinion

Patitucci v. Laverty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1990No. 2800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal filed by the Nationwide Insurance Company. Nationwide challenges the trial court’s imposition of sanctions under Philadelphia Local Rule 170 for unreasonable refusal to settle. Nationwide argues that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that Rule 170 applies under the circumstances of the present case. Further, Nationwide contends that Rule 170 is unconstitutional. We reverse.

In July of 1979, James Patitucci, a minor at the time, 1 , filed a complaint against Thomas W. Laverty and Peter M. Pino. Patitucci claimed that Laverty negligently operated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Equipment Finance, Inc. v. TothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Ricci v. RicciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. DeFazio v. LabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. DeFazio v. LabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re a Conservatorship Proceeding Ex Rel. Germantown Conservancy, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Saastomoinen v. PaganoNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc. v. List, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API