Legal Opinion

Akers v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided September 29, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01098Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TIMOTHY AKERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-CV-01098-NJR COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) (Doc. 8). Plaintiff Timothy Akers filed a timely response (Doc. 13). Costco also filed supplemental authority (Docs. 14-1; 18-1). For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND As…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API