Application of Andrew T. Bova v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Chief Judge:
By two orders in the spring of 1971, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(3), the District Court for the Western District of New York authorized the tapping of certain telephones, not on premises occupied by the appellants, Bova, Carbone and Divizio (hereinafter “the witnesses”), on the basis of applications by the United States showing probable cause to believe that the premises were being used for the conduct of a gambling business prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 1955. The taps yielded, among other things, conversations of the three appellants. They were later subpoenaed to testify…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Luther R. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. William C. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Nicholas DistefanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jasper Junior MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Allen M. Dorfman, (Two Cases). Appeal of David Dorfman Appeal of William E. Webbe. United States of America v. Allen M. DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.