Legal Opinion

Grenawalt v. AT & T Mobility, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 2, 2013No. 11 Civ. 2664(ALC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge.

This case presents a tangled web of claims and cross-claims. Plaintiffs John Grenawalt, Carlos Miranda and Julio Alicea (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), former security guards, bring claims under different theories against a motley crew of defendants: Alpha-Omega Protection Services Corporation (“A-0”), and its principal, Grace DePompo (“DePompo” and, together with A-0, the “A-0 Defendants”), who directly employed Plaintiffs as temporary security guards; AT & T Mobility (“AT & T”), the alleged joint employer, in whose New York and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Grenawalt v. AT & T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Dixon v. NBCUniversal Media, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Zampos v. W & E Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API