Legal Opinion
In Re Sherbrooke Sodding Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1998No. 6:96-cv-00041PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
This ease raises a challenge to a Minnesota-implemented federal program promoting affirmative action. The federal program funds highway construction, maintenance, and repair. The matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment.
I. Background
Three cases have been consolidated, each involving Sherbrooke Sodding, Co. or Sherbrooke Turf, Inc., both Minnesota corporations, (collectively referred to as “the companies”). The companies provide turf establishment and erosion control — they lay sod. The companies are subcontractors oh state and federally…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherbrooke Turf, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Rothe Development Corp. v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1999
- Sherbrooke Turf, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, United States of America, Intervenor Gross Seed Company v. Nebraska Department of Roads, United States Department of Transportation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. EmbryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Grueter v. Witherspoon Brajcich McPhee PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.