Legal Opinion

Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Patrick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2009No. 49A02-0807-CV-614PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Respondent, Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund (the Fund), appeals the trial court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment in favor of Appellee-Petitioner, Gary Patrick (Patrick), Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Patrick, Deceased.

We affirm. 1

ISSUE

The Fund presents three issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following single issue: Whether the trial court erred when it granted Patrick an independent claim for damages for emotional distress in conjunction with his claim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Groves v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Briles v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. PatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Spangler v. BechtelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API