Legal Opinion
Hird/Blaker Corp. v. Slattery
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1991No. 88 Civ. 5976 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Hird/Blaker Corporation (“Hird/Blaker”) and Chye-ong Lim (“Lim”), have moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment to reverse the ruling of William S. Slattery, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service (the “INS”), denying Hird/Blaker’s application to classify Lim as eligible for temporary worker status as an architectural cost estimator, pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (the “Act”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i). The INS has moved for judgment on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wong Wing Hang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Joseph Bertrand v. Charles Sava, Laissez-Moi Vigile v. Charles SavaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Tongatapu Woodcraft Hawaii, Ltd. v. Sam I. Feldman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fernandez v. Chios Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Domingo Antonio De Los Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shanti, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- EG Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006