Legal Opinion

Beer v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1911No. 73PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, G. A. 6788 (T. D. 29144).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The importer; appellant here, assails the validity of the appraisement, reappraisement, and re-reappraisement of certain embroidered robes.

Concededly, the principal market of the country for such merchandise was St. Gall. There is no controversy as to the rate of duty applicable, but the question here raised concerns the validity of the different appraisement proceedings.

It is contended by the appellant that each and all of the appraise-ments were invalid for two reasons: First, that neither the imported' merchandise nor the legal packages or samples were before any of the appraising officers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Passavant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Johnson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Oelrichs & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API