Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Haskell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 1926No. 16251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Cad-do county, Okla., by B. E. Haskell, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, plaintiff in error, defendant below, to’ recover damages in the sum of $522.22. claimed for delay in the shipment of 99 head of cattle, from Oklahoma City to Kansas City, and for shrinkage fn the weight of said cattle. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the lower courr.

The plaintiff’s petition, among other things, alleges that on the 29th day…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Meyer v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Bash v. HowaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Kurn v. Westheimer & DaubeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API