State ex rel. Peery v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Eobert H. Peery the supreme court granted its order directing the district court for Eamsey county and Honorable Has-cal E. Brill, presiding judge thereof, to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not be issued commanding him forthwith to vacate a certain order filed by him on November 27, 1917. Eespondent made return.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
On the petition of relator this court issued an order requiring the district court of Ramsey County, and the Honorable Hascal R. Brill, presiding judge thereof, to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding that a certain order in the ease of Robert H. Peery v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, be vacated and set aside. The order was one staying all proceedings -on the part of plaintiff until he shall have paid the judgment for costs and disbursements, amounting to $558, rendered in the action in favor of defendant and against plaintiff by the Supreme Court of the United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Felt v. AmidonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Buckles v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1891
- Chapman v. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
- Clark v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Peery v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lipman v. BechhoeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Rambo v. Chicago Great Western Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Rambo v. Chicago Great Western Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936