Johnson v. Industrial Commission

I concur in the judgment and in paragraphs one, two, three, five and six of the syllabus and paragraph four thereof except that part which overrules paragraphs one and four of the syllabus of Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co., 148 Ohio St., 693, 76 N. E. (2d), 892, and in part Industrial Commission v. Bartholome, 128 Ohio St., 13, 190 N. E., 193. To such overrulings I dissent. In my view the Sebek case was decided on correct legal principles as stated in the syllabus of that case. There, the appellant was accidentally injured by the consumption of poisonous food, the noxious germs in…