Legal Opinion
People v. Hildreth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of official misconduct (Penal Law § 195.00 [1]) and eavesdropping (§ 250.05). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, that contention is without merit (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). In support of his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting the eavesdropping conviction, defendant contends that there was a “complete…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. BroomfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- BROOMFIELD, TIMOTHY D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- MAXWELL, WILBERT T., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013