Zimmerman v. Hill
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Acting Chief Judge.
This is a joint appeal from a final decree in a mortgage foreclosure. The appellants *433Mitchell were the original owners and mortgagors and the appellants Zimmerman were their grantees. The Mitchells were permitted to intervene and file defensive pleadings to the complaint of the appellee Hill. The basis upon which the appellants seek reversal of the final decree of foreclosure is the failure of the chancellor to recognize and apply the defense of usury.
There is no apparent dispute of the fact that appellants Zimmerman knew of the mortgage in question when purchasing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alabama-Florida Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Shuler v. HardinIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Spinney v. Winter Park Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Pierson v. BillSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Clair v. City Bank and Trust Co. of St. PetersburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- King v. L & L Investors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987