Legal Opinion

White v. White

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrew J. Di Paola, J.

This motion presents yet another instance of the peripheral jousting between substituted attorneys in matrimonial actions. Indeed, the aftermath of the dissolution of the marriage often leaves the former and present attorneys for the parties still on the litigation battlefield while their clients have retired from the fray.

In July of last year, plaintiff wife moved this court for an order directing substitution of attorneys. The motion was granted by order dated July 29, 1980 in which this court directed as follows: “Prior to any turnover of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Goldenberg v. AdlerNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Yaron v. YaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Theroux v. TherouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Edwards v. Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Murrah, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. M.E. v. S.G.New York Family Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API