Missouri Farm Bureau Federation v. Kirkpatrick
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
This is mandamus.
According to a stipulation of facts, rela-tors submitted a petition to respondent’s office on July 4, 1980, containing 167,363 signatures supporting placement on the November 4, 1980, ballot of a constitutional *948amendment to limit state and local government spending. On September 2, respondent received 1,377 affidavits from persons within the Sixth Congressional District requesting withdrawal of their signatures. Of these affidavits, respondent accepted 1,178, leaving an insufficient number of signatures to put the question on the November ballot.
On September 5, relators filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Harry v. IceIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- County Board of Education v. Board of Education of Hartsburg Rural Special School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Buchanan v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Citizens for Rural Preservation, Inc. v. RobinettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rekart v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Shawnee Bend Special Road District "D" v. Camden County CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Buchanan v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.