Legal Opinion
Bingham v. Cabot
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 14, 1798PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
3 U.S. 382 (____)
3 Dall. 382
BINGHAM, Plaintiff in Error,
versus
CABOT, et al.
Supreme Court of United States.
Lee, Attorney General, contended for the Plaintiff in error.
THE COURT were clearly of opinion, that it was necessary to set forth the citizenship (or alienage, where a foreigner was concerned) of the respective parties, in order to bring the case within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court; and that the record, in the present case, was in that respect defective.
This cause and many others, in the same predicament, were, accordingly, struck off the docket.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bingham v. CabotSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
3Cited by52 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.