Legal Opinion

Illegitimates' Workmen's Compensation Benefits

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided August 25, 1975No. Official Opinion no. 75-26PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KANE, Attorney General,

There is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania a case which challenges the constitutionality of section 307 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, art. Ill, as amended, 77 P.S. §562, which provides:. . compensation shall be payable under this section to or on account of any child, brother or sister, only if and while such child, brother or sister, is under the age of sixteen. ... If members of decedent’s household at the time of his death, the terms ‘child’ and ‘children’ shall include…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Nordmark v. Indian Queen Hotel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Mohan v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lehigh Foundations, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API