Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 13, 1984No. 2 CA-CR 2774, 2 CA-CR 2979-2PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Appellant was indicted on three counts of sexual assault in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1406 and one count of attempted sexual assault in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1001 and 13-1406. All of the counts involved different victims and allegations of prior conviction were filed for enhancement purposes pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604. Count three, attempted sexual assault, was later dismissed by the state and appellant was tried separately on counts one and two. He was found guilty by a jury of count one and the jury also found the allegations of dangerousness and prior conviction to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BeatyArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FainIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SchadArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Gary Arland Mitchell v. Bob Goldsmith, Deputy Warden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.