Legal Opinion · Dissent

Redmond v. Jenkins (In Re Alternate Fuels, Inc.)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2015No. 14-3086Published

1DissentPhillips, Circuit Judge

I would affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision to recharacterize the loans as equity. Absent our doing that, I would remand the question of whether Mr. Jenkins has a valid security agreement against the Cabanas litigation proceeds. Because we do not remand that question, I explain why I believe the existing record does not support a finding that Mr. Jenkins has a secured claim.

I. Recharacterization

I begin by recognizing a simple fact: Mr. Jenkins was not funding Alternate Fuels, Inc. (AFI) to keep a struggling business afloat in hopes that it might later make money. Instead, for his financial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sender v. Bronze Group, LTD.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Stinnett's Pontiac Service, Inc., Richard W. Stinnett and Gay P. Stinnett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Mid-Town Produce Terminal, Inc., Bankrupt. G. J. Sinclair v. James R. Barr, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API