Legal Opinion

People v. Guntert

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided September 18, 1981No. Crim. A. No. 59331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Placer County is named after a technique of mining for gold—placer mining—that was used extensively in the Sierra foothills *1090after the discovery of gold in California and until the early years of the 20th century.1 Placer mining is basically a process by which miners build dams, divert waters through flumes or ditches, channel the waters into huge pipes and, ultimately, into nozzles large enough to make one believe that Gulliver himself might have used one to water his garden. When these giant nozzles are trained on gold bearing soil, the water discharged from the monitor washes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Scherling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. SpearmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lake Madrone Water District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API