Legal Opinion

Fenstermaker v. Page

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1889No. 1295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Eureka County. A. L. Fitzgerald, District Judge. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Belknap, J.:

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. The complaint charges that defendant falsely and maliciously, and without reasonable or probable cause, instigated a criminal proceeding against the plaintiff for the alleged crime of wounding cattle, the property of another man, by reason whereof plaintiff was damaged, etc. The cause was tried in the district court. When the plaintiff rested his case, a motion for nonsuit was allowed, based upon the ground of failure to prove want of probable cause for, and malice in, the prosecution of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ricord v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Brennan v. TracyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bonamy v. ZenoffNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jaksich v. GuistiNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bank of Miller v. RichmonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ohrenberger v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API