Legal Opinion

Ohrenberger v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1923No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The purpose of this action is to recover damages arising out of an alleged malicious prosecution. In April, 1920, the plaintiff had been working for the defendant company for about eight years as a freight brakeman. His home was in Grand Rapids. The defendant Benjamin Havens is a special police agent for the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. On or about the 11th of April, 1920, the plaintiff’s wife, from whom he was at that time separated, turned over to Havens various articles of property which she claimed the plaintiff had stolen from the railroad company. Havens took the goods to his office…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Skidmore v. BrickerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Fenstermaker v. PageNevada Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Patterson v. GarlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Turner v. O'BrienNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API