Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pierce Norton Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The defendant has for many years owned and operated an amusement resort at Lake Corn-pounce in the town of Bristol. On a plot of ground between an “airplane ride” and a “scooter” building, it maintains a pole carrying wires and a transformer for the purpose of furnishing electricity required for the operation of resort equipment. The pole is braced by a guy wire made of twisted steel strands. The lower end of the wire is fastened to a pipe driven into the ground, and it runs from this fastening to the top of the pole at an angle of about forty-five degrees. The plaintiff, a girl twelve years…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Turgeon v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. Bernier v. Woodstock Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Nordgren v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Laflin v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cimino v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
  2. Hoffman v. Mohican Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Lapalme v. TottleConnecticut Superior Court · 1949
  4. Gail v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Connecticut Superior Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API