In re R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
First, Reynolds contends that the Property Tax Commission should have dismissed the appeal. Reynolds argues that the right to appeal is controlled by N.C.G.S. 105-324(b) and that neither the tax supervisor nor the assistant county attorney has the authority to give notice of appeal under the statute. Pertinent parts of the statute are:
§ 105-324. Appeals to Property Tax Commission from listing and valuation decisions of boards of equalization and review . . .(b) Any property owner of a county or member of the board of county commissioners or board of equalization and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- In Re the Assessment of Additional Sales & Use Taxes Against Halifax Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Templeton Oldsmobile-Cadillac-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- J.I.C. Electric, Inc. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986