Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Exceptions from Luce. (Steere, J.) Respondent was convicted of resisting an officer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The respondent in this case was informed against for resisting a constable in the township ■of McMillan, on June 30, 1887, who was at the time *342alleged to have been engaged in the effort to maintain, preserve, and keep tbe peace. He was tried in the circuit court for tbe county of Luce, before Judge Steere with a jury, and was convicted.

The following is a copy of the information in the case:

“ Sanford N. Dutcher, prosecuting attorney in and for' the county of Luce aforesaid, for and in behalf of the-people of the State of Michigan, comes into said court in the July term thereof, in the year…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. SimsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People v. De MeauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. Clarence ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. People v. MargelisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API