People v. Margelis
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
Convicted of resisting an officer, defendant prosecutes review by writ of error.
The information charged the resistance in the language of the statute, named the officer, and alleged the duty he was performing. Defendant’s motion to quash on the ground that the information did not specifically set out his acts was overruled. The Constitution (Art. 2, § 19) requires that an accused be informed of the nature of the accusation against him. The statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, .§ 14994) defines the nature of the crime here involved. The information informed the accused of the nature of the accusation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. McArronMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MissouriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Groulx v. CarlsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MorehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. ClyburnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. KelleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.