Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1983No. 81-3-424Published

1DissentLarsen, Justice

I agree with the majority’s rejection of the Commonwealth Court’s standard for determining when death “results from” an occupational disease under section 301(c)(2) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (the Act), 77 P.S. § 411(2), which standard was first articulated in Consolidation Coal Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), 37 Pa.Commw. 412, 391 A.2d 14 (1978). However, I cannot subscribe to the majority’s interpretation of section 301(c)(2) under the circumstances presented by this case or the holding that, where an occupational disease exists among the secondary (or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Gradel v. InouyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API