Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Urstadt

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarry B. Frank, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding to vacate and annul a determination by the respondent Urstadt, the Commissioner of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York, authorizing an increase in maximum average monthly room rental by respondent Washbridge Housing Corp.

Respondent Washbridge Housing Corp. is a limited-profit housing company, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the provisions of article 2 of the Private Housing Finance Law, that owns and operates a limited-profit rental housing project known as Bridge Apartments, located in Manhattan. An application dated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eastwood Building Committee v. EimickeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Podhaizer v. EimickeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API