Legal Opinion

Armer v. Nagels

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1939No. 34,140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for the destruction of a crop of barley in which plaintiff claimed an interest. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The action grew out of a transaction alleged to have occurred between plaintiff and defendant with reference to a lease of a quarter section of farm land.

The petition alleged that plaintiff and defendant entered into a written lease for the farm in question on August 15, 1933, whereby plaintiff agreed to deliver defendant two-fifths of the small grain raised on the place at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ZakouraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. McVicar v. McVicarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Solomon v. LamplSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Hamilton v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. O'BRYAN v. Home-Stake Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API