Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Blagman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1986No. 1443PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition without a hearing after the appointment of counsel. The court held that appellant waived his right to PCHA relief by waiting nine and one-half years before bringing this collateral attack on his judgment of sentence. Although the court erred in finding a waiver, we affirm the denial of relief due to the frivolity of appellant’s PCHA petition.

Appellant was sixteen years old when arrested for first degree murder and other offenses. He was convicted by a jury and sentenced to life…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. RawlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. StinnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API