Legal Opinion

Smith v. Urich

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 1997No. 95-CV-0342; CA A95143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Urich, 1 a codefendant in this claim for negligence, appeals from the grant of third-party plaintiff Comer Drug’s motion for summary judgment on its cross-claim for indemnity. ORCP 47. We reverse.

Urich is the owner of real property. Corner Drug leased the property from Urich and operated a business that was open to the public. Smith, Corner Drug’s business invitee, filed an action against both Urich and Comer Drug in which he alleged that he had sustained personal injuries when he tripped on a defect in the sidewalk outside the business and that all defendants were negligent. Corner Drug…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. KENNEDY v. ColtOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore Excavating, Inc. v. Consolidated Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  3. Jones v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Andersen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. v. Radiator Specialty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API