Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 27, 1995No. Civil Action No. 94-40093 FHFPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AT DEPOSITIONS (Docket No. 36)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The matter before the Court concerns Plaintiff Andrew J. Carter’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents at Depositions. At issue is the interrelationship of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(b)(5) and 34 and the Court’s scheduling order.

On September 20, 1995, Plaintiff served three deposition notices, one on the director of the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Northampton, Massachusetts, one on the director of the Veterans…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Contardo v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alper v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  2. Latitude Service Company v. ReeseDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API