State v. Klontz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.
This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of State v. Leistiko, 352 Or 172, 282 P3d 857, modified on recons, 352 Or 622, 292 P3d 522 (2012). State v. Klontz, 353 Or 208, 297 P3d 480 (2013). In our prior decision, State v. Klontz, 242 Or App 372, 256 P3d 138 (2011) (Klontz I), we concluded that the trial court properly admitted under OEC 404(3)1 evidence of prior sexual offenses committed by the defendant in order “‘to rebut defendant’s claim that the victim! ] had consented’ ” to sexual contact. Klontz I, 242 Or at 384 (quoting State v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. Sanchez-ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. H. D. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.