Legal Opinion

Majestic Insurance v. Allianz International Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 9, 2001No. C 00-1804 SCPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this reinsurance dispute, plaintiff Majestic Insurance Company (“Plaintiff’) seeks declaratory relief, attorney’s fees, punitive damages, and profit disgorgement from at least fifty individual insurance company defendants that are members of the Institute of London Underwriters (“ILU Defendants”) and at least seventy-two underwriters acting on behalf of Members of Lloyd’s, London (“Lloyd’s Defendants”) for breach of contract, contract reformation, breach of the covenant of good faith…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  3. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buschman v. Anesthesia Business Consultants LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  3. General Star Indemnity Company v. JRK Property Holdings, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
  4. Landec Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  5. PHL Variable Insurance Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API