Legal Opinion
PHL Variable Insurance Company v. Continental Casualty Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 18, 2020No. 3:19-cv-06799Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE Case No. 19-cv-06799-CRB COMPANY, 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 REMAND AND DENYING AS MOOT v. ADDITIONAL MOTIONS 11 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY 12 COMPANY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Now pending is Plaintiff PHL Variable Insurance Company’s (“PHL”) motion to remand 15 this action to the Superior Court for the County of San Francisco. Remand Mot. (dkt. 12) at 1. 16 PHL filed its First Amended Complaint in that court, seeking a declaration of its rights under 17 insurance…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.