Legal Opinion
Covelo Indian Community v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1990No. Nos. 87-7116, 87-7118PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The Covelo Indian Community (the “Community”), a federally recognized Indian Tribe, and California Trout, Inc. (“Cal Trout”), a private fishing organization, seek review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) decision to relicense a private utility’s hydroelectric project in Northern California. FERC has moved to dismiss the petitions for lack of appellate jurisdiction, contending that (1) the Community was denied intervenor status and hence may not seek judicial review of the merits of the agency’s order; and (2) Cal Trout failed to timely seek rehearing from the agency’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Covelo Indian Community v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, California Trout, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Mendocino County, California County of Sonoma Sonoma County Water Agency, Respondents-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990