Commonwealth v. Snyder
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
This case involves an interpretation of Paragraph (d)(3)(i) of Rule 1100. Prompt Trial, Pa.R.Crim.P., which requires that periods of delay resulting from the unavailability of the defendant shall be excluded in determining the period for commencement of trial. We are asked to decide whether attempts by the defendant to qualify for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD), involving contacts with the attorney for the Commonwealth, would operate to overcome the “unavailability” of the defendant resulting from an *584outstanding bench warrant issued for failure to appear at a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007