Legal Opinion

McDonald v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 18, 1976No. 396-73; No. 436-73PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

In these consolidated cases, enlisted marines were convicted by separate general courts-martial of violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and sentenced to terms of imprisonment and bad conduct discharges. After completion of appellate review within the military system, they brought these actions for back-pay, asserting among other reasons that their convictions were constitutionally invalid because of the involvement under the Uniform Code of the convening authority in the court-martial process.

*64Ronald McDonald, whose crime was assault with intent to commit murder,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Secretary of the Navy v. AvrechSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Healy Tibbitts Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Barnett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Southland Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Curry v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API