Legal Opinion

ICE Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 7, 2009No. Case 05-4135-JARPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on review of the punitive damages awards made by the jury. The parties have filed briefs on the propriety of these awards and the Court heard oral argument on April 17, 2009. As described more fully below, the Court finds that the following punitive, or exemplary damages are appropriate: (1) against defendant Ratier-Figeac, S.A.S. in the amount of $9,590,600; and (2) against defendant Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, in the amount of $2,397,650.

1. Background

This case proceeded to trial on various claims…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mattel, Inc. v. Mga Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Contour Design v. Chance Mold SteelDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API