Legal Opinion

Apuzzo v. County of Ulster

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1984PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to respondents against both appellants, for the reasons stated in its memorandum (98 AD2d 869). We add that, whether or not petitioner has standing to bring the instant proceeding in light of the provisions of article IV of the collective bargaining agreement (Chupka v Lorenz-Schneider Co., 12 NY2d 1; Matter of Soto [Goldman], 7 NY2d 397), the issues raised are properly before us on the county’s appeal, it having cross-petitioned for the same relief. We note further, however, that the claim of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Soto (Goldman)New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Chupka v. Lorenz-Schneider Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Apuzzo v. County of UlsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Ass'n & Buffalo Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Marin v. BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Mottironi v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Carroll v. GunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API